DDF Exclusive Padmaavat | Shahid Kapoor, Ranveer Singh and Deepika Padukone

[Sai Jai]

The basic things such as important parts of Gaura and Badal was missing. They didn't portrait their character. They were one who brought Rana Ratan Singh back.

I even also heard that Padmavati never visited Khilji place they were Gaura and Badal who visited Khilji and bring back Rana Ratan Singh.

All are saying this is the major drawback of movie

Reason is Bansali want to project Rani padmaavati character in whole film

So he mixed history & creativeness in story that went blunder

 

[Shantanu Upadhyay]

All are saying this is the major drawback of movie

Reason is Bansali want to project Rani padmaavati character in whole film

So he mixed history & creativeness in story that went blunder

Then bhansali should not have promoted padmavat as a story based on Indian history.
After doing such pramotion when he felt that his idea is going in wrong direction he decided to put a disclaimer, what the hell who the hell read the disclaimer when the movie starts.and what is meaning of such disclaimer when he promoted the movie aa real Indian historical drama.
It looks like he is playing with Indian history just to make money.:angry:

 

[Shantanu Upadhyay]

If someone supports his claiming that cbfc has cleared the movie then as long as I know cbfc provides certifite a movie based on two points
1.how much n*d*ty there is in the movie
2.how much violence there is in the movie.

But cbfc never see if the movie is fully based on real history or not and if the movie maker says thay it is fictional than cbfc would ask him to put a disclaimer in the start of the movie that's it and the movie gets the clearance. no matter how the movie maker promoted the movie all around the world (as a historical drama real one in the case of padmavat) he gets a certificate for his movie from cbfc, a green signal to release the movie, this is equal to misleading advertisement he should be fined for this not appreciated.

 

[hike]

Then bhansali should not have promoted padmavat as a story based on Indian history.
After doing such pramotion when he felt that his idea is going in wrong direction he decided to put a disclaimer, what the hell who the hell read the disclaimer when the movie starts.and what is meaning of such disclaimer when he promoted the movie aa real Indian historical drama.
It looks like he is playing with Indian history just to make money.:angry:

+1

 

[Bapun]

Padmaavat sees quiet release in Bhopal

 

[Sarkar]

'Padmaavat' earns Rs. 525 Crores; continues to rule at Box Office - Times of India

Sanjay Leela Bhansali's magnum opus 'Padmaavat' is proving to be unstoppable as it goes on to become the director's biggest film of his career.

When will we get it in playstore ?:angry::angry:

 

[Rajkumar]

https://twitter.com/x/status/974260160247009282

Source

 

[Rajkumar]

https://twitter.com/x/status/974349165089247233

Source

 

[JollyLNB]

Will it come to Colors?

 

[Rajkumar]

I think yes,