Show World Cup Matches on Doordarshan, Orders Supreme Court

wewake said:
will never bid for any event around the world... will file case against broadcasters for not sharing the feed... will again file a case for revenue distribution.. will telecast their own advertisements... poor pre n post match shows... eagerly waits for wicket fall so they can run poor advertisements before action replay... poor commentry.... moreover It is a Government Agency. :(

their motto is WHY TO WASTE MONEY WHEN YOU WILL GET IT FOR FREE.

Ek to chori... uprr se seena chori...!!!

There is a revenue share agreement between the broadcaster & Prasar Bharti. It's somewhere 75:25. So, its not free.
 
praks001 said:
There is a revenue share agreement between the broadcaster & Prasar Bharti. It's somewhere 75:25. So, its not free.

Who will pay for the loss of subscription revenues. And Doordarshan Ad rates are much lower than star sports. So there is a potential loss in ad revenues too.
 
DD can share World Cup signals with cable operators: Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has stayed the order of the Delhi High Court barring Doordarshan from sharing the signals of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 with cable operators.

The leave petition will meanwhile be heard on 17 February by when ESPN and Star Sports will submit their replies.

In its judgment, the High Court had refused to strike down the must carry clause under which cable operators have to carry signals of Doordarshan nor the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act 2007.

A bench of Justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva passed the order on the plea of Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), ESPN and Star who had contended that cable TV operators were getting live feeds through DD channels free of cost, resulting in loss of revenue for them.

In its order, the Court refused to strike down a 2000 notification issued by Prasar Bharati, which made it mandatory for cable operators to carry DD National and DD News channels. Simultaneously, the court also rejected the additional prayers by ESPN Star to strike down Section 3 of the Sports Act, which makes it mandatory for them to share with Prasar Bharati the live feed of sporting events of national importance.

DD officials said the Mandatory Sharing Act was clear that matches would have to be shared with DD on its terrestrial network and via its direct-to-home Freedish. An official said the directive by the Court appeared to be a precautionary measure aimed at warning cable operators who pirate the signals and not Doordarshan.

In the order, the High Court had said, “The appeal as well as writ petition (civil) 8458/2007 are allowed to the extent that the live broadcasting signal shared by ESPN/Star by virtue of the Sports Act with Prasar Bharati, shall not be carried in the designated Doordarshan channels under the must carry obligation cast by the Cable TV Network Act on cable operators. This shall operate prospectively.”

In its directive, the Court had also observed that while the advertisement revenue received by DD in respect of the shared content of the sports channels was to be shared in the ratio of not less than 75:25, “it still does not cater to the loss of subscription revenue” by ESPN and Star.

BCCI, Nimbus Communications Ltd and the two sports channels (ESPN and Star) had challenged the High Court's single judge November 2007 order rejecting their pleas that no cable television network, Direct-to-Home (DTH) Network, multi-system network or local cable operator could broadcast such sports events without a licence from the content owners.

Indian Television Dot Com | DD can share World Cup signals with cable operators: Supreme Court
 
praks001 said:
There is a revenue share agreement between the broadcaster & Prasar Bharti. It's somewhere 75:25. So, its not free.
but they are generating that revenue without spending any single money....!!! and Star sports or any other broadcasters getting that revenue with a huge loss
 
wewake said:
but they are generating that revenue without spending any single money....!!!

That's totally fair. There are millions in the country who cannot afford hefty packages from star. There are some set of rules & everyone should respect that.
 
praks001 said:
That's totally fair. There are millions in the country who cannot afford hefty packages from star. There are some set of rules & everyone should respect that.

ya am agree that everyone can't afford those packages... but that DD feed should not be on cable tv...
 
praks001 said:
That's totally fair. There are millions in the country who cannot afford hefty packages from star. There are some set of rules & everyone should respect that.

and if government want to show that events on national TV they can also bid for that like others... by this they can generate more revenue.... but it seems they are not interested in all these stuff as they know they will get it for free :)
 
wewake said:
ya am agree that everyone can't afford those packages... but that DD feed should not be on cable tv...

It is very difficult to produce two different feeds of the same channel & derive a mechanism to monitor that in such a less time. These events are of a national importance and noone should be denied of that.
 
wewake said:
and if government want to show that events on national TV they can also bid for that like others... by this they can generate more revenue.... but it seems they are not interested in all these stuff as they know they will get it for free :)

As I said earlier that they give 75% of the revenue to the broadcaster. 25% is for the compensation of the revenue loss that DD will suffer by not broadcasting the scheduled programs. So DD aren't earning anything. Sometimes they also suffer a loss.
 
Back
Top Bottom
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock