Sad News 6 channels removed from Tata Sky

[JollyLNB]

I think all 6 channels are FTA channels

No.

 

[TheFearLess]

I don't think even 5-10% of subscriber base is affected by this removal.

If they can remove 20+ channels which might be affecting more than 80% of subscriber base, 5-10% should hardly bother them.

 

[amarnathkvk]

If they can remove 20+ channels which might be affecting more than 80% of subscriber base, 5-10% should hardly bother them.

 

[SarFa]

If they can remove 20+ channels which might be affecting more than 80% of subscriber base, 5-10% should hardly bother them.

Fearless reply:clap:

 

[Azad]

very bad move by TATA sky. cable tv better than this premium DTH Company.

 

[Ajun]

Very bad move , removing tamil channels channels !! And saying premium DTH by themselves !!

 

[pkcha]

Why they removing care WORLD it's nice channel and exclusive on tatasky platform. Look like they promoting their service channel TATASKY FAMILY HEALTH

 

[Zaxotes]

Lets assume X drives a taxi. A, B and C sign a contract with X such that they use his taxi service to commute to their office everyday in exchange of a fixed money as fees; say 1000 rupees per month. Now A pays the fees every month while B and C have to be reminded of it. B pays once he gets reminded while C neglects it. X says he will not be able to continue serving C until he pays the fees. C never cares. X decides to leave him off and only pick A and B next time. As a result, C could not show up at his office.

Now, should the company that has hired C blame him for his irresponsible attitude or X for not providing his service to C though the terms in the agreed contract were not met?

As per some members here, X should continue serving him despite C not abiding to contract.

 

[TheFearLess]

Lets assume X drives a taxi. A, B and C sign a contract with X such that they use his taxi service to commute to their office everyday in exchange of a fixed money as fees; say 1000 rupees per month. Now A pays the fees every month while B and C have to be reminded of it. B pays once he gets reminded while C neglects it. X says he will not be able to continue serving C until he pays the fees. C never cares. X decides to leave him off and only pick A and B next time. As a result, C could not show up at his office.

Now, should the company that has hired C blame him for his irresponsible attitude or X for not providing his service to C though the terms in the agreed contract were not met?

As per some members here, X should continue serving him despite C not abiding to contract.

Extending the story, X was driving that car on behalf of Y and Y used to pay X an amount of 600 out of 1000. 3 Years later Y started charging 2000 from A,B and C. But adamant not to give X more than 600 according to what they negotiated 3 years back. So one day X said enough is enough I am out of it, I can not continue in same amount.

Then Y started telling A,B and C that X was asking for more money so we have stopped dealing with him. OMG !!!

 

[dino29]

Lets assume X drives a taxi. A, B and C sign a contract with X such that they use his taxi service to commute to their office everyday in exchange of a fixed money as fees; say 1000 rupees per month. Now A pays the fees every month while B and C have to be reminded of it. B pays once he gets reminded while C neglects it. X says he will not be able to continue serving C until he pays the fees. C never cares. X decides to leave him off and only pick A and B next time. As a result, C could not show up at his office.

Now, should the company that has hired C blame him for his irresponsible attitude or X for not providing his service to C though the terms in the agreed contract were not met?

As per some members here, X should continue serving him despite C not abiding to contract.

If X being a premium brand is overcharhing, taking advantage and exploiting C then company should blame X & force X to mend way else arrange for a new option & take care of rights of C. Also if X is unwilling to help C then he is indirectly damaging his business, if C reaches company & does productive work then there will be more with him to continue services of X & provide steady revenue

Similarly if company pays any third party to get a work done then that agency or individual can't pocket all the money without delivering on promise saying that amount is non refundable & due to unreasonable demand put forward by certain department we can only complete 30% work