Channels Available in MPEG4 & Upcoming MPEG4 on Tatasky

  • Thread starter Thread starter SUNIEL
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 381
  • Views Views: Views 109,251
Status
Not open for further replies.
Deep.S said:
Please correct bro...Dabangg from Sri Adhikari & Dangal from Enterr 10 media.

Ok bro now corrected :k I just little bit confused between dangal and dabangg.:shy
 
I think Mastiii addition would be difficult, some others are FTA...
 
There was some news about Mastiii channel addition on TS being dragged into the court by Adhikari Brs.
 
NinadG said:
There was some news about Mastiii channel addition on TS being dragged into the court by Adhikari Brs.

Why they do this only with TS?What's the problem?:huh
 
Srajal Ag said:
N now ts is not afraid to launch new chs in mpeg2. ..

I think because ts got the tps from Isro So i.e they are not afraid of launching channels in mpeg2 & also not doing migration
 
karanrudra93 said:
Why TS refused?
Tatasky replied in TDSAT as Capacity constrain but I think Tatasky consider mastii is not a popular channel

TDSAT refuses TV Vision petition against TataSky
May 24, 2012, 07.51PM IST


NEW DELHI: Broadcast tribunal TDSAT has refused the plea of TV Vision, promoters of the music channels 'Mastiii', to stay the Direct-to-Home operator TataSky from adding any new channel to its platform.

TDSAT's interim order came over a petition filed by TV Vision requesting the tribunal to direct TataSky to distribute its channel through its DTH platform.

TV Vision had also requested that till the pendency of its plea, TataSky should be injuncted from adding any new channel and a slot for 'Mastiii' should be kept.

TV Vision had alleged that TataSky has been refusing its request to beam the channel 'Mastiii' from its DTH platform on the ground of capacity constraints.

Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) also said that any new channel added by TataSky on its DTH platform "during pendency of this petition (by TV Vision) will be subject to the outcome" of its order.

TDSAT said it would decide "whether respondent (TataSky) has been providing access to its platform in non- discriminatory manner" and "whether the petitioner (TV Vision) has been treated in a fair, unbiased and equitable manner" by TataSky.

TataSky should be given an "opportunity to file its reply before adjudicating on the issue raised" by TV Vision, it added.

TV Vision has contended that TataSky's refusal to beam the channel 'Mastiii' was in violation of clause 7.6 of the DTH licence conditions that mandates TataSky to provide access to various content providers/channels on a non-discriminatory basis.

It also submitted that 'Mastiii' has one of the highest TRP ratings in its genre and has been placed at the top position for number of weeks on TRP charts and TAM ratings.

TV Vision also alleged TataSky has included channels with lesser rating on its DTH platform.

However, the tribunal said that no mandatory provision has been made in the regulation where an obligation has been casted upon a DTH operator to provide its platform to carry the signals of any broadcaster.

"Although there is must provide clause, there is no provision of must carry the signals of the broadcaster by the DTH operator under the said regulation," said TDSAT member R K Rastogi while passing the order.

It further observed that there are a large number of channels and is not possible for a DTH operator to carry all the channels due to capacity constraints.

TataSky also declined the allegations of TV Vision and said that it already had seven music channels.

TDSAT refuses TV Vision petition against TataSky - Economic Times
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom