Breaking Reliance Big TV issues notice to Tata Sky for alleged breach of commercial terms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amit1079
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 21
  • Views Views: Views 3,549
iphifi said:
TS had agreement but they withdrew the offer voluntarily after RDTV was sold. So TS only paid sum for number of STBs exchanged and not for all users as required. Now Pantel is saying we need full money. So maybe TS should continue to show their ad in RDTV home channel and poach all remaining users? Is that what Pantel wants?
Click to expand...

No bro

As per article issue is abt ts have to pay due amount for acquiring rdtv stb worth rs.3000/STB

79 crores have to pay by ts to rdtv

Agreement cancellation is not a issue i guess meanwhile Nagpal telling no such agreement

Pantel want due amount not extra amount or acquiring all subscribers :)
 
Gobinaath said:
No bro

As per article issue is abt ts have to pay due amount for acquiring rdtv stb worth rs.3000/STB

79 crores have to pay by ts to rdtv

Agreement cancellation is not a issue i guess meanwhile Nagpal telling no such agreement

Pantel want due amount not extra amount or acquiring all subscribers :)
Click to expand...
What Rs.3000/stb :ouch:and only Rs.150/subscriber? What kind of deal is this? TS is really premium I guess.:em:
 
Mr. NagPal Said here was no understanding between the two companies. So RDTV Claim Only Hardware Charges TS paying ABove Amount.:unsure:
 
Mayur said:
Mr. NagPal Said here was no understanding between the two companies. So RDTV Claim Only Hardware Charges TS paying ABove Amount.:unsure:
Click to expand...
Yes only hardware charges have to pay to rdtv
 
Gobinaath said:
means bro ?? You want ts shouldn't give those money to rdtv ??
Click to expand...

I meant the amount looks too high initially, for someone to agree to pay that much. It would obviously be some calculation based on no. of subscribers.
 
I think Nagpal felt cheated after signing Rs.3000/stb as Airtel also advertised for exchange. On the other hand TS had home channel ads and balance transfer schemes so they clearly had an official agreement. Pantel has technical advantage in this case as far as agreement is concerned. TS's main argument is that the agreement is for a false transaction. Anyway minimum TS will have to pay for home channel ad.
 
iphifi said:
I think Nagpal felt cheated after signing Rs.3000/stb as Airtel also advertised for exchange. On the other hand TS had home channel ads and balance transfer schemes so they clearly had an official agreement. Pantel has technical advantage in this case as far as agreement is concerned. TS's main argument is that the agreement is for a false transaction. Anyway minimum TS will have to pay for home channel ad.
Click to expand...

You Say Means TS Have Right on This Way & they Do Agreement Before Acquiring. They Can't Pay Additional Amount Excepting Hardwear. Am I Right Bro.
 
2 More Posts...
Back
Top Bottom