Ankit_bpl said:Now The Question Comes As To Whether TATA-SKY Will Be Able To Add Many More Channels" Including The HD Ones, Once The GSAT Ku-Band Transponders Become Operational?
We Know GSAT-10 Has 12 Ku-Band Transponders, Just Like The INSAT 4A. The Number Of Channels That Can Be Crammed Into Each Transponders Is Fixed, And Is Unlikely To Be Any Different From The INSAT 4A, Unless The Bit-Rate For Individual Channels Is Drastically Reduced. So How Would TATA-SKY Be Able To Accommodate More Channels Once It shift's To The GSAT-10?
How To Add More Channels Without Reducing The Bit Rate For The Existing Channels?
Any Idea Please Reply !!!
Compression tech Also evolves almost every year, just look at 4K. When it was invented it cannot be broadcasted via sat bcoz it required so much bandwidth but now 4K chs required only 2-3 HD chs space. I think if TS use h.265 then they can add 110+ SD chs on same 36 MHz tps as H.265 gives you double the data compression ratio compared to H.264/MPEG-4 AVC at the same level of video quality.
So to increase bandwidth to add chs you can do two things, either invest on satellite transponder or invest on Compression. It's a matter of preference which solution you want