Mylanji
Contributor
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2017
- Messages
- 991
- Reaction score
- 2,149
A short disclaimer before I start this discussion - I don't at all have the intention to stir up a controversy over discussing this topic, but the changing dynamics of news channels over the years with regards to proper reportage of news, has forced me to speak about this. If the admins and moderators find this thread inappropriate, they can very well remove this. No questions will be asked.
On that note, let's start -
Before this wave of news channels started, news broadcasts were limited to 15 minutes, or in some cases, half an hour on a standard television channel. Then after maybe 1998, when NDTV launched India's first private news channel Star News in partnership with Rupert Murdoch, the scenario changed. Star News gave birth to some honest and also, some (now) notorious newscasters who changed the way we used to view news.
After the launch of Star News, Zee suddenly came to the news channel space with the launch of Zee News, the first private Hindi news channel in India. Later on Aaj Tak, which used to air as a half hour news bulletin on the now defunct DD Metro, was moulded into a 24 hour news channel.
Honestly speaking, that should've been it. Because during that particular period, these few channels that were launched, were no doubt doing 'true journalism'. That was truly a period when news was not noise. When holding a discussion or debate was not for the sake of TRP. The newscasters (now anchors) were very careful about their words. But sadly, it didn't stop there. It gave way for many news channels to launch in the near future, thereby disrupting the ecosystem of honest and true journalism.
The downfall started when a newly launched channel called India TV helmed by the now notorious 'journalist' Rajat Sharma, started a new way of reporting called 'Sting operation' which used hidden cameras to expose wrongdoings of certain influential individuals belonging to the entertainment industry. This led to a dangerous trend being followed by each and every news channel that went on air, or were already on air. Spycam reporting in the name of Sting operations became the norm and news channels started becoming TRP machinery.
Later on in 2003, the state run Prasar Bharati too launched the DD News channel in place of DD Metro, which of course was never in the TRP race, and stuck to basic news reporting. But that too changed after 2014. And now if we see the present state of these news channels, there's more of drama and misinformation rather than news in these channels. Be it national or regional, every news channel these days has shamelessly turned away from the ethics of journalism that once used to rule the news channels. Not to mention funding from Corporate houses and political parties that they get.
In other countries, there are not so many news channels like us. They only have 3 to 4 and in some cases - 5 channels which are only for news, as opposed to the horrendous number (400!) we have when it comes to news channels.
And the so called regulatory bodies which were formed to bring these errant news channels to book, are nothing but mute spectators with little or no appropriate action being taken.
So that's why I ask - Instead of having so many news channels, shouldn't there be only 5 news channels, one being run by Prasar Bharati and the other four being private, so that such atrocities in the name of reporting can be stopped?
Also I'm leaving a poll on the topic here. Please take that poll and give your valuable opinions (without bias, offensive verbiage and hatred) in the thread.
Thank you.
On that note, let's start -
Before this wave of news channels started, news broadcasts were limited to 15 minutes, or in some cases, half an hour on a standard television channel. Then after maybe 1998, when NDTV launched India's first private news channel Star News in partnership with Rupert Murdoch, the scenario changed. Star News gave birth to some honest and also, some (now) notorious newscasters who changed the way we used to view news.
After the launch of Star News, Zee suddenly came to the news channel space with the launch of Zee News, the first private Hindi news channel in India. Later on Aaj Tak, which used to air as a half hour news bulletin on the now defunct DD Metro, was moulded into a 24 hour news channel.
Honestly speaking, that should've been it. Because during that particular period, these few channels that were launched, were no doubt doing 'true journalism'. That was truly a period when news was not noise. When holding a discussion or debate was not for the sake of TRP. The newscasters (now anchors) were very careful about their words. But sadly, it didn't stop there. It gave way for many news channels to launch in the near future, thereby disrupting the ecosystem of honest and true journalism.
The downfall started when a newly launched channel called India TV helmed by the now notorious 'journalist' Rajat Sharma, started a new way of reporting called 'Sting operation' which used hidden cameras to expose wrongdoings of certain influential individuals belonging to the entertainment industry. This led to a dangerous trend being followed by each and every news channel that went on air, or were already on air. Spycam reporting in the name of Sting operations became the norm and news channels started becoming TRP machinery.
Later on in 2003, the state run Prasar Bharati too launched the DD News channel in place of DD Metro, which of course was never in the TRP race, and stuck to basic news reporting. But that too changed after 2014. And now if we see the present state of these news channels, there's more of drama and misinformation rather than news in these channels. Be it national or regional, every news channel these days has shamelessly turned away from the ethics of journalism that once used to rule the news channels. Not to mention funding from Corporate houses and political parties that they get.
In other countries, there are not so many news channels like us. They only have 3 to 4 and in some cases - 5 channels which are only for news, as opposed to the horrendous number (400!) we have when it comes to news channels.
And the so called regulatory bodies which were formed to bring these errant news channels to book, are nothing but mute spectators with little or no appropriate action being taken.
So that's why I ask - Instead of having so many news channels, shouldn't there be only 5 news channels, one being run by Prasar Bharati and the other four being private, so that such atrocities in the name of reporting can be stopped?
Also I'm leaving a poll on the topic here. Please take that poll and give your valuable opinions (without bias, offensive verbiage and hatred) in the thread.
Thank you.
Last edited: