Rishithulyan
Member
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2016
- Messages
- 404
- Reaction score
- 250
abhinaba said:With an aim to ramp up capability ( goal of carrying out 1 launch mission a month of both its current PSLV-GSLVs, as well as future LVM3) ISRO had initiated setting up of Second Vehicle Assembly Building [SVAB] .
"The Second Vehicle Assembly Building will provide enhanced launch frequency of PSLV and GSLV by facilitating parallel integration operations. It will also provide redundancy to existing Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) for integration of GSLV MK-III and also as a prime integration facility for third launch pad and future general launch vehicles"
So is it not clear that 2nd launch pad is underutilised ?
bro, you are quoting the need aspect justification of SVAB, upon which the govt has sanctioned the money for the SVAB.
Yes, SVAB will be very much required, to meet the target of one launch per month, that too involving increased frequency of Mk-II and Mk-III launches. But you have to realise that situation is not now. It is a future requirement. It will take minimum 3-5 years for such a situation of frequent launches of PSLV, Mk-II & MK-III, of the order of one launch per month.
Think of the current condition. Mk-II vehicle is not fully flight proven. One Mk-II vehicle takes nearly 6-8 months for preparation currently, owing to the delay in readiness for its Cryo Stage.
Mk-III preparation at VAB and Mk-II preparation at SSAB will happen as per schedule. the launch dates are depending on the availability of Cryo stages. VAB occupied with Mk-III preparation is not causing any delay to the Mk-II schedule. The schedule for Mk-II is delayed because its Cryo stage is arriving delayed at SHAR.
Why are you not understanding the point which I am repeating :-O