Breaking NTO 2.0 partially upheld by Bombay HC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vadirocks
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 709
  • Views Views: Views 94,611
Status
Not open for further replies.
But,Vadirock should provide a credible source before making such statement.The only thing which can be said now is that Broadcast would not publish their new RIO today and Vadirock has created much -awaited excitement redundantly without any mean.Vadirock should come and information us about why the majority of broadcaster haven't published their new RIO until now?All users are requested not to create a hype without any credible source and proof.
He himself is the source. He didn't create any artificial hype. He posted whatever his sources allow him. I don't get what your expectations are when we mostly get news on the forum even before most industry covering sites.
 
Last edited:
But,Vadirock should provide a credible source before making such statement.The only thing which can be said now is that Broadcast would not publish their new RIO today and Vadirock has created much -awaited excitement redundantly without any mean.Vadirock should come and information us about why the majority of broadcaster haven't published their new RIO until now?All users are requested not to create a hype without any credible source and proof.
What do you think he is Chief of IBF or he has time machine? How would he know what is in broadcasters mind and what they will do. Whatever update he gets from broadcaster side he tells us clearly and we all should appreciate him for accurate updates. He cannot reveal his source because of privacy policy of companies.
 
What do you think he is Chief of IBF or he has time machine? How would he know what is in broadcasters mind and what they will do. Whatever update he gets from broadcaster side he tells us clearly and we all should appreciate him for accurate updates. He cannot reveal his source because of privacy policy of companies.
We all believe in Vadirocks bro.... So whatever he says must be correct....
 
So, the time has come to have a post similar to 2018 one, the list will be updated as and when information arrives.

The RIOs mentioned in the first post are January 2020 ones as per old NTO rules and not relevant in the current scenario.

Mavis Satcom (Jaya Network)

http://jayatvnetwork.com/upload/PDF/RIO_15012020.pdf

Odisha TV

https://img.odishatv.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/NTOv1-2020.pdf

IN10 Media

https://www.epicchannel.com/wp-cont...ed-as-on-30-09-2020_-final-version-_-pdf-.pdf

CSL Infomedia (Jan TV Plus)

http://jantv.in/JANTVPLUS-RIO-DAS.pdf

Lex Sportel Vision (1Sports)

http://1sport.in/wp-content/themes/accesspress-mag/images/1SPORTS_RIO_All_Platforms_NTO_2.0.pdf

Suryansh Broadcasting (Flowers TV)

SBPL_RIO-DAS-2020-21.pdf (flowerstv.in)

Links to existing important threads and articles

Threads

Articles

RIOs (Discussion threads)

* No threads for Odisha TV, CSL Infomedia, and Lex Sportel Vision since pricing is unchanged.

Note: More links will be added if we find any good explanatory posts. If you find any worthy explanation which needs to be included here, hit the report button on that post.

Broadcaster
Whether NTO 2.0 compliant?
Date of compliance
Link to RIO
Remarks
Mavis Satcom (Jaya Network)​
Yes​
January 15, 2020​
Not live on DPOs​
Odisha TV​
Yes​
March 1, 2020, or before​
Same rates as Tariff Order 2017 as discounting is capped at 15% by OTV itself​
IN10 Media​
Yes​
March 9, 2020​

Bouquet not live anywhere, A-la-carte channels live on DPOs​
STAR India​
ZEE Entertainment​
Sony Pictures Network India​
Indiacast Media​
WarnerMedia (formerly Turner International India Private Limited)​
Eenadu Television (ETPL)​
Celebrities Management Private Limited (Travel XP)​
Sun TV Network​
Raj TV Network​
Silverstar Communications (Mega TV Network)​
Discovery Communications India (DCI)​
New Delhi Television Limited (NDTV)​
BBC Global News India Private Limited (BBC)​
Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited (Times Network)​
CSL Info Media Private Limited (Jan TV Plus)​
Yes​
Unknown (January 15, 2020)​
Same rate as NTO 1.0 as it is a standalone channel​
Greycells18 Media (Topper TV)​
Lex Sportel Vision (1Sports)​
Yes​
August 4, 2020​
Same rate as NTO 1.0 as it is a standalone channel​
NOIDA Software Technology Park Limited (NHK World Premium HD)​
TV Today Network (Aaj Tak)​
Suryansh Broadcasting (Flowers TV)​
ABP Network​
(FTA currently, likely to turn into Pay)​
Fame Media (4tv Urdu)​
(MRP declared last year, but still FTA)​
Direct News Private Limited (NewsX)​
Reference Interconnection Offer - NewsX
Tariff Order 2017 RIO, not Tariff Amendment Order 2020​
(FTA currently, likely to turn into Pay)​
Dangal Kannada (Enterr10 Television)​
Tariff Order 2017 RIO, not Tariff Amendment Order 2020
(FTA currently, likely to turn into Pay)​

Jaya TV was the first one to comply with NTO 2.0. That too initial deadline of 15/01/2020 🙂
 
This is so true. Broadcasters should have taken initiative and moved to HD only scenario by now, and there was a traction for the same in the early HD adaptation period, but then came the rule of not downscaling the channels.
If such rule exists how come Jaya tv hd is downscaled
Rule itself is useless 🙄
 
जया टीवी एनटीओ 2.0 का पालन करने वाली पहली कंपनी थी। वह भी शुरुआती समय सीमा 15/01/2020मैं
योyou are right but wait big network sony, star, zee, viocom 18 bauquet 🙁
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom