Salman Khan 2002 hit-and-run case

[Anup Tiwari]

RE: Salman Khan convicted in 2002 hit-and-run case for 5 Yrs

Salman Khan sentenced to 5 years
in jail in 2002 hit-and-run case

 

[Sanjeev]

infact the victims, themselves wanted compensation. :s

I dont say, that he shud not been given any punishment, but everyday, there are many incidents of road rage, thousands of ppl die everyday on d roads... nothin will hppn to them, cases gets resolved upon mutual consent/compensations etc...

But just bcoz salman is a star, an example is being set out of him :s

YEs but I think he will get bail and I am deeply disappointed by the verdict that guy has hold that pain for 12 yrs and our Indian Jurisdiction is so pathetic that it takes 12 yrs to make him guilty agar saja hi dena tha to pehle kyun nahi diya aur ab kiske upar ehsaan kar rahe hai :angry:angrywall

 

[shawl_who]

our judicial system comprises of slow, lazy ppl... easy to bribe as well :dodgy

 

[Sanjeev]

our judicial system comprises of slow, lazy ppl... easy to bribe as well :dodgy

This shows the mentality of Indian judicial system ek case ko 13 saal tak lamba kheecha thats why international media is laughing at our systems :dodgy:dodgy

 

[piinku1]

Faith in indian judicial system restored.

 

[jenius-jatt]

Sad news

 

[Dileep Kumar]

.

.

.

 

[harshbardhan]

Difficult to comment. For some people good decision and for some shocking. I am having a mix feeling. Heart is heavy both for Salman's condition as well as for those innocent people who suffered.

 

[Anup Tiwari]

Actor Salman Khan has been
convicted for culpable homicide on
Wednesday in 2002 hit-and-run case.
The word 'homicide' came from the
Latin terms, meaning killing of a
human being by a human being is
homicide.
CulpableHomicide is defined by
section 299 of the Indian Penal
Code. According to the section 299
of IPC whoever causes death by
doing an act with the intention of
causing death, or with the intention
of causing such bodily injury as is
likely to cause death, or with the
knowledge that he is likely by such
act to cause death, commits the
offence of culpable homicide.
The essential elements of the
offence of culpable homicide are as
follows -
i) that death of a human being was
caused ;
ii) by an act with the intention of
causing death ; or
iii) by an act with the intention of
causing such bodily injury as is
likely to cause death ; or
iv) by an act with the knowledge
that the act was likely to cause
death . Without one or other of
these elements an act , though it
may be in it's nature criminal and
may occasion death , will not
amount to the offence of culpable
homicide .
Section 299 defined Culpable
Homicide in simple way. Culpable
homicide are of two kinds:
I. Culpable homicide amounting to
murder.
II. Culpable homicide not
amounting to murder.
Culpable homicide is the Genus, and
murder is the Species.
All murder are culpable homicide
but not vice-versa. Section 299
cannot be taken to be definition of
culpable homicide not amounting to
murder. Culpable homicide is the
genus, section 300 defines murder
which means murder is the species
of culpable homicide.
It is to be noted here that culpable
homicide not amounting to murder
is not defined separately in IPC, it is
defined as part of Murder in the
section 300 of IPC.
Section 300 - Except in the cases
hereinafter excepted, culpable
homicide is murder, if the act by
which the death is caused is done
with the intention of causing death,
or
Culpable Homicide is not amounting
to murder: Exception 1 to 5 of s300
of IPC defines conditions when
culpable Homicide is not amounting
to murder:
I. Provocation.
II. Right of private defense.
III. Public servant exceeding his
power.
IV. Sudden fight.
V. Consent.
Exception-
1-culpable homicide is not
amounting to murder if the offender,
whilst deprive of self control by
grave and sudden provocation,
caused the death of the person who
gave the provocation or causes the
death of any person by mistake or
accident.
The above exception is subject to
the following provisions:- The
provocation is not sought or
voluntarily provoked by the offender
as an excuse for killing or doing
harm to any person.
2.The provocation is not given by
anything done in obedience to the
law, or by a public servant in the
lawful exercise of the powers of such
public servant.
3. The provocation is not given by
anything done in the lawful exercise
of the right of private defense.

 

[Anup Tiwari]

BREAKING
Bombay HC to hear Salman Khan's
bail plea at 4pm today