- Thread starter Esmail
- Start date
- Featured
- Replies: Replies 1,407
- Views: Views 300,470
daydreamer18
Contributor
- Joined
- 30 Mar 2024
- Messages
- 863
- Reaction score
- 1,115
Then any possibility of reducing price of star value pack?
daydreamer18
Contributor
- Joined
- 30 Mar 2024
- Messages
- 863
- Reaction score
- 1,115
Its take some more time they will change the graphics and remove itColors TV still not removed 'viacom 18' footnote from the logo & Why Jio Star website taking too much time for full activation..The nation wants to know
Elvin Paul
Contributor
- Joined
- 4 Mar 2018
- Messages
- 761
- Reaction score
- 1,295
But, is Viacom18 defunct? If so, then who holds 46.82% share in the joint venture?Colors TV still not removed 'viacom 18' footnote from the logo & Why Jio Star website taking too much time for full activation..The nation wants to know
Raju lal
Contributor
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2018
- Messages
- 3,031
- Reaction score
- 5,204
I am confused with it. RIL press release states its Viacom 18. But Viacom 18 which is a subsidiary of Network 18 merged into Star. So rightfully the shareholder becomes network 18. Maybe the assets of Viacom 18 in JV valued to 46% thereby establishing the same as stakeholder.
I don't know why Reliance stuck with Viacom 18 brand. Even this JV not happen, there is no need of continue with 'Viacom' branding as Paramount the original owner of Viacom completely exited from buisness as well as 'Viacom' brand globally went defunt. This merger is a good chance to drop Viacom 18. But still Reliance priorities it over Network 18 or any other branding.
Viacom 18 established as a 51:49 JV with Viacom & Network 18. So the name make sense then. Later Viacom's share shrunk to just 13%. Viacom brand itself shutdown and replaced with paramount. But Reliance was not ready to rebrand the company all these time. Don't know why.
Last edited:
Rajpatil98
Member
- Joined
- 15 Feb 2019
- Messages
- 2,451
- Reaction score
- 4,378
Probable reasons why both networks packs will continue to operate separately
1. Both networks already offer a substantial number of channels in their respective packs. For instance, Star’s packs include plenty of channels. Adding Colors channels and increasing the pack price is likely to have a negative effect on the subscriber base, as consumers might find the higher price unattractive.
2. Operating the packs separately is already generating significant profits. Combining all channels into one pack could result in lower subscription revenue compared to the current setup with separate packs.
For example both Colors and Star Plus are leading GECs. Combining them into a single pack would necessitate additional costs, increasing the overall price of the pack. This could discourage subscribers due to the higher cost, thereby impacting revenues negatively.
3. By keeping the packs separate, both networks can continue to generate stable subscription revenues without risking subscriber loss. This approach ensures smooth operations and financial stability.
4. In the future, the channels might be combined into a single pack, but this is unlikely until the ban on frozen ad rates is lifted. Until then, the networks need to compensate for the losses caused by frozen ad rates over the next two years. Operating separate packs allows them to maximize revenue during this period.
Imo both networks will continue running their packs separately for now to maintain profitability.
1. Both networks already offer a substantial number of channels in their respective packs. For instance, Star’s packs include plenty of channels. Adding Colors channels and increasing the pack price is likely to have a negative effect on the subscriber base, as consumers might find the higher price unattractive.
2. Operating the packs separately is already generating significant profits. Combining all channels into one pack could result in lower subscription revenue compared to the current setup with separate packs.
For example both Colors and Star Plus are leading GECs. Combining them into a single pack would necessitate additional costs, increasing the overall price of the pack. This could discourage subscribers due to the higher cost, thereby impacting revenues negatively.
3. By keeping the packs separate, both networks can continue to generate stable subscription revenues without risking subscriber loss. This approach ensures smooth operations and financial stability.
4. In the future, the channels might be combined into a single pack, but this is unlikely until the ban on frozen ad rates is lifted. Until then, the networks need to compensate for the losses caused by frozen ad rates over the next two years. Operating separate packs allows them to maximize revenue during this period.
Imo both networks will continue running their packs separately for now to maintain profitability.
Ashish_91
Contributor
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 970
- Reaction score
- 1,556
For a second i forgot that they are merged now and think for few minutes that when i switched fro jio to hotstar as i was watching the match
Jiostar will not limit itself to premium subscription model-Uday Shankar
Last edited by a moderator:
I've said it many times before they will continue jio cinema model and keep sports free
Last edited by a moderator:
