Breaking NTO 2.0 partially upheld by Bombay HC

[PowerStar]

Star should shut down regional sports channels . There is no point in having them. Just like Sony they should give audio feed

Why should they shutdown ? People who wants to hear commentary their own mother tongue ,they will subscribe it.

Negative points of audio feeds
Many of people don't know how to change audio feeds.seperate is best
Pre ,post match presentation will not be in our language
We will not get separate special programs about sports.
We will not get highlights in our language.


If they want to shutdown ,then they shut down along with Hindi channel.
Edited ..

 

[Stvnn]

Let them do there work first
Afterwards we will do our work
We know what to do
We and Trai already did, so many channels shutdown after trai 1
After trai 2 many will shutdown definitely
With low trp

Hd will shutdown for sure it seems
And those sd users planning to take hd connection will cancel that plan

 

[Stvnn]

Star should shut down regional sports channels . There is no point in having them. Just like Sony they should give audio feed

This topic is already discussed bro

 

[iDJ]

Why should they shutdown ? People who wants to hear commentary their own mother tongue ,they will subscribe it.

To save cost and acquire more content. Sports is an universal thing. It can be enjoyed even without commentary. There are lots of things that can be watched in mother tongue. They should go and support them local artist.

Star should shut down regional sports channels . There is no point in having them. Just like Sony they should give audio feed

Sony here is no saint either. Sony Ten 4 is mostly a simulcast feed which airs content in Tamil and Telugu which should be revamped or shut down.

 

[dino29]

Yes, TRAI please come to consumer's space and regulate it as well. I want iPhones priced as much as Xiaomi phone. After all both offers almost same features anyway. Who wants innovation and competition?

You r comparing 2 entirely diff things...mobile operators or manufacturers r free to design product or features and so r cable or dth operators but Netflix cannot b priced diff for 2 mobile operators same ways channels cannot b priced diff for various cable or dth operators.
Mobile operators r free to give services at discounted cost so r cable or dth providers as they deem fit for business

TRAI is just giving u options and i put forward one more...no one is forcing u and that is competitive market rules

 

[iDJ]

You r comparing 2 entirely diff things...mobile operators or manufacturers r free to design product or features and so r cable or dth operators but Netflix cannot b priced diff for 2 mobile operators same ways channels cannot b priced diff for various cable or dth operators.
Mobile operators r free to give services at discounted cost so r cable or dth providers as they deem fit for business

TRAI is just giving u options and i put forward one more...no one is forcing u and that is competitive market rules

No point of arguing with you. You don't understand the true concept of competition. You want everything to be priced same. You don't understand the concept of premium market. This mindset is having broadcasters launch SD channels in the year 2021 where the norm should be 4K. Japan will have 8K channels while we get stuck with 576i because of communist pricing model.

 

[satyajeet]

No point of arguing with you. You don't understand the true concept of competition. You want everything to be priced same. You don't understand the concept of premium market. This mindset is having broadcasters launch SD channels in the year 2021 where the norm should be 4K. Japan will have 8K channels while we get stuck with 576i because of communist pricing model.

Do you support cross-subsidisation? Old tarrif order just did that apart from différential pricing. While you appear not to support everything to be priced at same level. But By supporting older system, you end up paying different price for same product.
Nothing can be said in black and white.

 

[iDJ]

Do you support cross-subsidisation? Old tarrif order just did that apart from différential pricing. While you appear not to support everything to be priced at same level. But my supporting older system, you end up paying different price for same product.
Nothing can be said in black and white.

Dude there is different factor to it. Someone here was charging me higher. Because this XYZ brand had been having more variety than others offering. That same XYZ users has access to better customer services. With everybody charging system. There is no point of offering better service when some ABC brand is charging same as XYZ premium brand.

 

[dino29]

No point of arguing with you. You don't understand the true concept of competition. You want everything to be priced same. You don't understand the concept of premium market. This mindset is having broadcasters launch SD channels in the year 2021 where the norm should be 4K. Japan will have 8K channels while we get stuck with 576i because of communist pricing model.

Ok. Will not discuss which i was.... Competition between broadcasters is still open just that TRAI providing equal and fair opportunities to operators and customers. Also if broadcasters were not so stubborn on giving huge discounts on bouquet and give standalone chs at extremely high cost then main problem would not have arisen. If say a channel was available for 5 Rs per month)avg calculated from long term deal price) then why r broadcasters not confident to give same price in current monthly model...if content, quality is good then customers will opt but as u know pushing unwanted chs stuff will stop

 

[Vishnu777]

Yes, TRAI please come to consumer's space and regulate it as well. I want iPhones priced as much as Xiaomi phone. After all both offers almost same features anyway. Who wants innovation and competition?

Iphone vs Xiaomi?

How relevant is this? IMO, Quality comes at its own price.