It is YOU who need to have a relook at it, as I have asked you multiple times to post the bouquet details from the Airtel Digital TV website, and you FAILED to do so. Since you failed to do so, I'm doing it for you from the Airtel Digital TV website below, Now you need to accept that you are wrong, as the discount percentage is NOT 33, but it is 35 (Without Tax).
Already answered this in above 2 posts
WRONG again. NTO 1.0 rules were NOT in place before the honorable Supreme Court Order was pronounced. The broadcasters approached the Madras high court way back in 2017, not only for the 15% discount cap cancellation, they wanted the entire NTO itself to be cancelled. After the Madras HC upheld the NTO 1.0 in March 2018, barring 15% discount capping rule, the broadcasters then went to Supreme Court and ONLY after the Supreme Court pronounced its judgement in 2019, FINALLY NTO 1.0 came into effect without any discount cap, and they published the NTO 1.0 compliant RIOs. You are TOTALLY WRONG with all your timelines. You are saying that the NTO is in place, even before Madras high court order and the broadcasters published RIOs to that effect. This is completely FALSE. Correct yourself thambi.
Buddy read again what i said. I said that that TRAI directed broadcasters to publish RIO complying with NTO Rules back in 2018 as same were to b implemented in 2019 and then broadcasters went to Madras High Court objecting to NTF regulations. I did not said NTO rules were already in effect before Madras High Court judgement, i said Broadcasters were required to publish RIO before that so that same can be implemented in 2019. Later. NTO implementation got deferred to March 2020.
The Supreme Court plea which i am referring to is not the 2019 one but recent one which was filed against the Bombay High Court order which gave go ahead to NTO 2.0 barring 2nd twin condition . Here is an article for the same, where broadcasters which mentions about broadcasters withdrawing this plea.
TV broadcasters withdraw petitions challenging Trai’s NTO 2.0
While allowing the withdrawal, the Supreme Court has kept the question of law of the broadcasters' challenge open, thereby, allowing the broadcasting industry the ability to re-agitate the legal challenge at a future date, if Trai fails to address their concerns
www.google.com
You are incorrect in all these statements as I stated above.
I am not wrong anna rather u r getting confused and not understanding all the points properly
Last edited: