We might have to go legal against ISRO

  • Thread starter ratedr
  • Start date
  • Replies: Replies 40
  • Views: Views 15,758

ratedr

Contributor
Joined
19 May 2013
Messages
536
Reaction score
203
Harit Nagpal, the managing director and CEO of Tata Sky, is upset. In a rapidly digitising television market, he is not able to offer more channels to
the company's 10 million subscribers because it
doesn't have satellite space. The Rs 1,590-crore
Tata Sky was the second operator to launch DTH or direct-to-home services, way back in 2006. At
that time, it decided to use an ISRO or Indian Space Research Organisation satellite as policy
favoured that. Since then, the market has grown
to a total of about 53 million homes or roughly
one-third of the total 153 million Indian TV
homes. Vanita Kohli-Khandekar spoke to him on
what holds back Tata Sky's growth in the Rs 39,000-crore television market. For full interview source We might have to go legal against ISRO: Harit Nagpal | Business Standard
 
how fast they realized to choose the legal option with ISRO. Tata Sky will loose huge amount of customers now. now the channel addition will not be there until next year also.
 
This action of ISRO is highly condemnable. They have violated the terms of agreement. Never expected such mean treatment from such highly regarded institution!
 
Wow, I wonder why Mr. Nagpal took so long to go public on these issues and in the meantime give false promises to customers via their agents/dealers? This is pathetic not only of the Government of India, but for Mr Nagpal and others making decision at TataSky. Why not choose a foreign satellite? Just because it needs manual shifting of antennae? Why did Airtel and Dish TV were fools who did exactly that and re-aligned the antennae/added dual LNB for their customers? Any why is MPEG4 rolling out starting June 2013 when they could have easily rolled out earlier in 2007-2008 and then would have to bear less cost for STB replacements. I feel there is something particularly wrong with how TS management (and those who particularly take decisions) is running the business. No wonder they have been in losses for all these years and not made a single rupee out of this business. Just wonder till how long they can sustain such pathetic management and keep pumping money down the drain from big pockets of Sky UK and Tata sons.
 
It's never too late. Let Tatasky finish the MPEG4 migration process and then search for a new foreign satellite. Meanwhile those playing with citizens taxes and Tatasky subscribers sentiments should be really taken to task.
 
70% extra space ??? very late then i already planing to switch to other operator ..tata sky also should think like reliance and should sell business :D
 
Satellite woes bog down Tata Sky’s Harit Nagpal

MUMBAI: Tata Sky MD Harit Nagpal is irate and the reason is not being able to expand his DTH service extremely irate. The reason: he has not been able to expand his DTH service’s offerings for sometime now. And for no fault of his or his company’s, he says.

Eight years ago, his company had contracted to use the government owned Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) satellite Insat 4A, with a proviso thrown in that if he needed more capacity, the satellite organisation would make the transponders available to him within two years of his request.

In 2007, his organisation wrote in asking for more capacity. By then, Tata Sky was having about two million subscribers with dishes pointing in the sky towards where the Insat 4A satellite is located in orbit.

Isro was slated to launch its Gsat-10 satellite with communications capabilities and Tata Sky had booked 12 transponders on it. The launch was delayed on account of something or the other. It finally, got into space in September 2012 off an Arianespace launch vehicle from Kourou in French Guiana.

The launch gave him some relief, but what has dumbfounded him, is the fact that the transponders have not been made available to him almost eight months since launch.

Since then, it has been a constant to and fro for his company. "We have been in touch with ISRO for a long time. We have written 100 emails to the ISRO chairman, met at least three to four times in the past six months. I know he wants to move things," says Nagpal. "But despite his wanting nothing is."

Nagpal has been told Tata Sky’s allocation is stuck with the Space Commission currently. Prior to that, it was held up with the Insat Coordination Committee for a few months. He has even written to the Prime Minister’s Office which has then forwarded his request to ISRO. And the yo-yoing has been going on since.

“It’s extremely frustrating,” says Nagpal. “I am a customer with a contract that entails me to pay Rs 50-60 lakh a month per transponder to the government as a rental. And I don’t have the government sticking to its contractual obligations.”

But why is this happening? “I guess it is inertia,” says Nagpal. “Like everything has been stuck in bureaucracy. Even on this front no one is taking a decision as yet. Our contract is stuck in bureaucratic limbo.”

Each of the 12 Ku-band transponders on GSat-10 have 36 MHz usable bandwidth with a footprint covering the Indian mainland with a power of 51.5 dBW. It is located at 83.0 degrees east in the same orbital location as Insat 4A and another Isro satellite GSAT-12.

“I am open to other options. If officials are worried, then let them throw Insat GSAT-10 open for tender,” highlights Nagpal. “There will be no takers for it. Tata Sky is the only DTH provider, which has 10 million dishes nationally pointing towards the same zone in the sky that GSat-10 is at currently. Imagine you have an expensive bird in the sky costing $300-400 million and it is not being used productively.”

Nagpal says he is days away from approaching the law of the land to force the government to stick to its commitments. “It’s not the ideal way,” he says. “I have been waiting for six years for my satellite transponders to be given to me. It has gone on long enough. There are no problems with my application; everything is sorted out. I am one of their main customers; so why such an extended delay?” he asks.

Is somebody in government listening? Or in Isro?

Indiantelevision.com called Isro chairman K. Radhakrishnan. And at that the time of writing was still awaiting a response from him. Keep watching this space for updates!

Source: Indiantelevision.com's > Digital Edge> Satellite woes bog down Tata Sky’s Harit Nagpal
 
Infact this is right time to disclose these thing publicaly because every one loose his patience. But if nagpal stated in early month of feb - march, then isro could escape very easily on statement of "satellite is being tested" but now every one knows how many days take any satellite for testing ? That why mr. Nagpal waited and when user are so irate because of waiting from 8 months they are shifting to other dth, hence he disclose these things publicaly. Now ts user are confident that ts trying best on company level to increase its channels lineup. And "there is way, there is will."
 
ts managment wer running company with profits

so waiting fore more profit without shifting to mpeg4 or foregn satellite.

now survival is difficult, forget about profit,

so coming to legal action against sleeping iso and space commision dept.
 
Back
Top Bottom
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock