Forums knows it very well who supporting who blindly leave that part
How u interconnting both at utmost different situation ?? For discussion we'll take ur words let me explain
Blackout is a temporary issue like not paying EB bill , Water bill etc.. if u pay ull get so we can't live without EB or water so we'll pay ie) broadcaster & dpo will make agreement at any cost temporary issue
But here , which fool made 150+ for FTA channels ?? Who made ncf ?? Who want that .. why not it should be 50+ taxes for 100 FTA channels ?? Who set 19 mininmum for pay channel ?? Why not 6rs per pay channel ??
If really want to help users transparency bla bla .. just u want all the people to take pay channels for that this trick made .. I'm a under knowledge person compare to urs but I itself got u didn't think this ?? Surely you will but u have to support so ur supporting
Have any direct answer means pls reply
Regards
I interacted exactly how you did, it was you who brought politics first here.
Who told you black out temporary issue but chs pricing and NCF not ? TRAI order clearly has direction that DPO are free to change NCF after few months. And regarding chs pricing it's obvious if product is not seling well then price will reduce automatically. You don't need degree in economics to understand it.
If you have not read the TRAI paper then you are making yourself fool. In that paper it was clearly descibed how TRAI arrived at Rs 130 figure. It was addition of two price. Rs80+ Rs 50. You can go and check there. Check miscellaneous part of that paper.
So i hope these are direct answer to satisfy your queries.
And forget to mention regading alc rate of 6 rs for pay chs, in current regime the max alc rate is Rs15(ref check sc judgement page 84 i think) for a ch which was set in decade ago. TRAI has raised this limit to 19. Only rs 4 hike in 10 years. Is it bad ?
Last edited: