Prateek Marwadi
Banned
- Joined
- 23 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 5,002
- Reaction score
- 983
sagar.patnaik said:Star Sports is a business entity and not a charity organization. What does the nation benefits from watching cricket that you consider it as national importance ??. You cant pay Rs 50 to watch world cup but you have cable great. Tomorrow u ll say I have car but I wont pay toll tax on highways. Star Sports has the right to bid and right to contest in court against some archiac laws. I do support that poor people should get it for free broadcast it free on terrestrial service but not on cable. You can always put an antenna to watch it for free. Its like people with money using BPL card to buy ration please I dont support it.
some of ur lines r really good n i totally support this. but sometimes u use some language which hurts badly.
i asked u on economic terms + rational + notional?
my q:
why v pay to both - ss channels + companies who r showing ads on these channels
why it shud not b free - bro if u know the economics then according to economics it must b free
i think govt. of india has taken the right step
it is of national importance - govt. of india n supreme court said it
ask star india to remove their base in India if they donot adopt indian policies
we dint force star india to come to india
if they think india law r not good then they shud quit india rather than challenging it to the court.
n if they r going then i ll ask them to take u also along with them bcoz u donot like indian mentality like star india does not.